Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> While I'm looking at this, is the first test involving
>> effective_cache_size bulletproof either? In particular, is
>> avgIndexTuplesPerPage clamped to be strictly greater than 1?
> It's based on collected statistics on already inserted tuple sizes. Since
> tuple sizes are measured after possible toasting, I don't see the way
> for avgIndexTuplesPerPage to be less than 1.
Yeah, but if it could be *equal* to one, you've got a zero-divide there.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2012-05-29 20:31:20|
|Subject: Re: pg_basebackup --xlog compatibility break|
|Previous:||From: Alexander Korotkov||Date: 2012-05-29 20:20:50|
|Subject: Re: GiST buffering build, bug in levelStep calculation|