Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to>, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views
Date: 2013-01-31 01:31:27
Message-ID: 18848.1359595887@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 01/30/2013 11:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> FWIW, I'd vote for not enabling that by default --- it's basically an
>>>> unwarranted assumption about how wide people's terminal windows are.

> Well, we could actually set the wrap value to 0, which would mean always 
> wrap. That wouldn't be making any assumption about the user's terminal 
> window size ;-)

I could live with that.  I rather wonder actually if WRAP_COLUMN_DEFAULT
shouldn't be removed in favor of using 0 as the default.  80-column
windows may be our coding standard for Postgres, but that doesn't mean
they're not pretty passe elsewhere.

			regards, tom lane


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Amit KapilaDate: 2013-01-31 03:39:58
Subject: Re: Review : Add hooks for pre- and post-processor executables for COPY and \copy
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2013-01-31 01:07:42
Subject: Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group