Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] CIDR/INET improvements

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CIDR/INET improvements
Date: 2006-01-24 15:11:07
Message-ID: 18590.1138115467@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de> writes:
> FWIW, I append the patch I've done a few weeks ago. It adds an inettocidr
> cast function.

I think we need to take two steps back and look at the larger picture:
the INET/CIDR situation is conceptually a mess and it's going to take
more than a localized change to clean it up.

I have some ideas about this and will try to post a proposal on -hackers
later today.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2006-01-24 15:38:47
Subject: Re: Weird pg_dumpall bug?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-01-24 15:05:43
Subject: Re: Weird pg_dumpall bug?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Alon GoldshuvDate: 2006-01-24 15:19:27
Subject: Re: Libpq COPY optimization patch
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-01-24 15:02:19
Subject: Re: Libpq COPY optimization patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group