Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery
Date: 2008-09-18 14:09:43
Message-ID: 18549.1221746983@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 09:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Do we really need a checkpoint there at all?

> "Timelines only change at shutdown checkpoints".

Hmm. I *think* that that is just a debugging crosscheck rather than a
critical property. But yeah, it would take some close investigation,
which maybe isn't warranted if you have a less-invasive solution.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-09-18 14:10:41 Re: Adding new flags to XLogRecord
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-09-18 14:08:32 Re: Adding new flags to XLogRecord

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-09-18 14:24:55 Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-09-18 13:50:47 Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery