Re: Concerns about this release

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Concerns about this release
Date: 2001-12-18 20:32:36
Message-ID: 18442.1008707556@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> writes:
> Plus, aren't there some isses with the non-locking vacuum?
>>
>> Such as?

> I'm not sure, I have vague recollection of some things (I thought the
> duplicate primary keys was on 7.2), but if you think it is good, then
> I'll take your word for it.

All the reports of duplicate rows are from people running 7.1.*.
The bug (or bugs) probably do exist in current sources as well,
but you cannot blame non-locking vacuum for it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Baccus 2001-12-18 21:01:09 Re: Connection Pooling, a year later
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-12-18 20:27:00 Re: Concerns about this release