Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: logistics for beta3

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: logistics for beta3
Date: 2010-07-05 16:18:38
Message-ID: 1770.1278346718@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Yeah, I hope to get that committed today. Any later than today will not
>> leave enough time for buildfarm testing before the wrap.

> Hmm.  So does that mean we need to get log_temp_files fixed today also?

No, I'm just concerned about the possibility of needing multiple
buildfarm cycles to shake out platform-specific problems with the
LDFLAGS changes.  The log_temp_files business doesn't have any
portability risks AFAICS.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Chris BrowneDate: 2010-07-05 16:33:49
Subject: Buildfarm + Git tryouts
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2010-07-05 15:43:36
Subject: Re: logistics for beta3

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group