Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I guess there is sort of a point there. So I'm leaning towards adding a
> "startup complete" flag somewhere in PGconn and simply fix up
I think you can use the conn->status field; you shouldn't need a new
flag, just test whether status is CONNECTION_OK or not.
> Seriously, in the worst case we'll get EINVAL.
So you'll just ignore an error? Okay, that'll probably work.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2001-07-06 18:42:39|
|Subject: Re: Vacuum and Transactions|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2001-07-06 18:29:03|
|Subject: Rule action ordering|