Re: WAL logs multiplexing?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dmitry Panov <dmitry(at)tsu(dot)tula(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WAL logs multiplexing?
Date: 2005-12-28 16:05:16
Message-ID: 17519.1135785916@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Dmitry Panov <dmitry(at)tsu(dot)tula(dot)ru> writes:
> Yes, but if the server has crashed earlier the script won't be called
> and if the filesystem can't be recovered the changes will be lost. My
> point is the server should write into both (or more) files at the same
> time.

As for that, I agree with the other person: a RAID array does that just
fine, and with much higher performance than we could muster.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Panov 2005-12-28 16:10:01 Re: WAL logs multiplexing?
Previous Message Ingo van Lil 2005-12-28 15:56:37 Re: Adding columns to a view

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Panov 2005-12-28 16:10:01 Re: WAL logs multiplexing?
Previous Message Dmitry Panov 2005-12-28 15:53:49 Re: WAL logs multiplexing?