From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Proposed p.tch for sequence-renaming problems |
Date: | 2005-09-28 04:14:19 |
Message-ID: | 1726.1127880859@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> Why did you rename the C function nextval() to nextval_text()?
I did that deliberately to make sure I'd catch all the dependencies.
If you like we can argue about whether to undo that aspect of the
patch --- it's surely not very critical --- but my vision of the future
path of development is that the text variant will go away entirely.
So I didn't like the idea of having "nextval" and "nextval_oid";
seems like that gives pride of place to the wrong thing.
> As an unrelated note, since we are going to force an initdb for the next
> beta, it would be nice to include the 64 bit parameter to pg_control ...
See other thread.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2005-09-28 05:09:47 | enhanced pgbench |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-09-28 03:59:34 | Re: Proposed p.tch for sequence-renaming problems |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-09-28 12:43:22 | Re: Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-09-28 03:59:34 | Re: Proposed p.tch for sequence-renaming problems |