Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,

From: Roy Badami <roy(at)gnomon(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Roy Badami <roy(at)gnomon(dot)org(dot)uk>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,
Date: 2005-03-23 23:57:22
Message-ID: 16962.610.750735.454374@giles.gnomon.org.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
    Tom> As you point out, the ISO spec doesn't actually say that that
    Tom> string literal has to be the external textual representation
    Tom> ... but it's surely pretty bizarre that it's not a good
    Tom> candidate to be the textual representation.

Yes, I'm convicned.  Particularly after considering casts of strings
to intervals...

   -roy


In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Ron MayerDate: 2005-03-24 00:02:33
Subject: Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,
Previous:From: Roy BadamiDate: 2005-03-23 23:56:09
Subject: Re: BUG #1518: Conversions to (undocumented) SQL year-month and

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group