Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] BLCKSZ 0?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Dominic J(dot) Eidson" <sauron(at)the-infinite(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BLCKSZ 0?
Date: 2001-02-28 04:46:09
Message-ID: 16918.983335569@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
"Dominic J. Eidson" <sauron(at)the-infinite(dot)org> writes:
> Any suggestion why postmaster/postgres would think it had been compiled
> with BLCKSZ 0? :

> root(at)blue:/usr/local/pgsql# su postgres -c "bin/postmaster -D
> /usr/local/pgsql/data "
> DEBUG:  Data Base System is starting up at Tue Feb 27 22:31:51 2001
> FATAL 2:  database was initialized with BLCKSZ 0,
>         but the backend was compiled with BLCKSZ 8192.
>         looks like you need to initdb.

Read that again --- it did *not* say it was compiled with BLCKSZ 0.
It said (or meant, anyway) it found zero in the pg_control field that
indicates the BLCKSZ in use in the database.  Something's broken with
your pg_control file ... care to give more details?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

  • BLCKSZ 0? at 2001-02-28 03:50:43 from Dominic J. Eidson

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Oliver ElphickDate: 2001-02-28 06:57:50
Subject: Re: [ODBC] Re: Release in 2 weeks ...
Previous:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 2001-02-28 04:30:39
Subject: Re: Re: Release in 2 weeks ...

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: will trillichDate: 2001-02-28 05:07:28
Subject: Re: postgresql upgrade/downgrade -- a clue?
Previous:From: Anand RamanDate: 2001-02-28 04:28:03
Subject: Re: Find out when a table was last changed ?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group