Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oliver Siegmar <oliver(at)siegmar(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps
Date: 2005-04-20 16:10:45
Message-ID: 1674.1114013445@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Oliver Siegmar <oliver(at)siegmar(dot)net> writes:
>> What datestyle are you using?

> Non-ISO (Postgres in that case), but the handling for non-ISO is all the same
> in interval.c ...

Yeah, I just confirmed here that it's broken the same way in all three
non-ISO datestyles.  Will look into a fix later today.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-04-20 17:15:59
Subject: Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps
Previous:From: Oliver SiegmarDate: 2005-04-20 16:07:16
Subject: Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group