Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_dump sort order for functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump sort order for functions
Date: 2010-01-11 17:54:10
Message-ID: 16452.1263232450@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On mn, 2010-01-11 at 10:44 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think you could probably use the existing tag field; no need for a new
>> one.

> Sorry, which tag field are you referring to?

The one called "tag" in the source code.  It prints out as "Name":

--
-- Name: binary_coercible(oid, oid); Type: FUNCTION; Schema: public; Owner: postgres
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
--

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Teodor SigaevDate: 2010-01-11 17:57:18
Subject: Re: point_ops for GiST
Previous:From: Greg Sabino MullaneDate: 2010-01-11 17:42:08
Subject: Re: Testing with concurrent sessions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group