Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Review: listagg aggregate

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Scott Bailey <artacus(at)comcast(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: listagg aggregate
Date: 2010-01-26 07:14:13
Message-ID: 162867791001252314t19badd31yee443e2bd38cd61@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2010/1/25 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:27 PM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:09 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> xmlagg -> concatenates values to form xml datum
>>> array_agg -> concatenates values to form array datum
>>> ??? -> concatenates values to form string datum
>>
>> concat_agg().
>
> I like that one...
>

why is concat_agg better than listagg ?

Pavel

> ...Robert
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Takahiro ItagakiDate: 2010-01-26 07:16:10
Subject: Re: Syntax supplements for SET options
Previous:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2010-01-26 07:07:35
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] problem with CVS on pgfoundry

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group