Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: some broken on pg_stat_user_functions

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: some broken on pg_stat_user_functions
Date: 2009-02-22 18:31:16
Message-ID: 162867790902221031n5f7f5b5bkfbdae7fb3ea6307c@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2009/2/22 Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> then documentation is probably little bit wrong (needs some additional
>> comment) . This text specifies using option 'all' for sql functions.
>>
>
> Attached documentation patch attempts to clarify this.
>
> regards,
> Martin
>
>

thank you
Pavel

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2009-02-22 20:47:15
Subject: Re: Hadoop backend?
Previous:From: Martin PihlakDate: 2009-02-22 18:23:28
Subject: Re: some broken on pg_stat_user_functions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group