James William Pye <pgsql(at)jwp(dot)name> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:17:43AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> but mainly I don't see the point.

> It's informative, no?

Well, the stuff included into the dump by pg_dump -v is informative,
too.  But we stopped doing that by default because of complaints.
I remain unconvinced that this proposal won't suffer the same fate.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: rfc: add pg_dump options to dump output at 2008-06-03 16:43:24 from James William Pye

Responses

• Re: rfc: add pg_dump options to dump output at 2008-06-05 00:20:23 from Greg Smith

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2008-06-04 04:06:17
	Subject: Re: Case-Insensitve Text Comparison
Previous:	From: Greg Smith	Date: 2008-06-04 03:48:24
	Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS