Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: rfc: add pg_dump options to dump output

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: James William Pye <pgsql(at)jwp(dot)name>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: rfc: add pg_dump options to dump output
Date: 2008-06-04 03:49:21
Message-ID: 16261.1212551361@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
James William Pye <pgsql(at)jwp(dot)name> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:17:43AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> but mainly I don't see the point.

> It's informative, no?

Well, the stuff included into the dump by pg_dump -v is informative,
too.  But we stopped doing that by default because of complaints.
I remain unconvinced that this proposal won't suffer the same fate.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-06-04 04:06:17
Subject: Re: Case-Insensitve Text Comparison
Previous:From: Greg SmithDate: 2008-06-04 03:48:24
Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group