James William Pye <pgsql(at)jwp(dot)name> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:17:43AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> but mainly I don't see the point.
> It's informative, no?
Well, the stuff included into the dump by pg_dump -v is informative,
too. But we stopped doing that by default because of complaints.
I remain unconvinced that this proposal won't suffer the same fate.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-06-04 04:06:17|
|Subject: Re: Case-Insensitve Text Comparison |
|Previous:||From: Greg Smith||Date: 2008-06-04 03:48:24|
|Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS|