Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2012-12-07 13:59:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> indisvalid should be sufficient.  If you try to test more than that
>> you're going to make the code more version-specific, without actually
>> buying much.

> Doesn't the check need to be at least indisvalid && indisready? Given
> that 9.2 represents !indislive as indisvalid && !indisready?

Um, good point.  It's annoying that we had to do it like that ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: pg_upgrade problem with invalid indexes at 2012-12-07 19:10:04 from Andres Freund

Responses

• Re: pg_upgrade problem with invalid indexes at 2012-12-07 21:30:36 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2012-12-07 21:30:36
	Subject: Re: pg_upgrade problem with invalid indexes
Previous:	From: Karl O. Pinc	Date: 2012-12-07 20:50:48
	Subject: Re: User control over psql error stream