Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> writes:
> Not if we expect pg_autovacuum to be able to work. It *needs* this
> information.

Why?

The implementation I've had in mind for autovacuum would rely on FSM not
the pg_stats daemon.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: Row level stats at 2003-03-06 16:43:40 from Rod Taylor

Responses

• Re: Row level stats at 2003-03-06 16:55:37 from Rod Taylor

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Dave Page	Date: 2003-03-06 16:52:32
	Subject: Partial index on date column
Previous:	From: Neil Conway	Date: 2003-03-06 16:47:11
	Subject: Re: Row level stats