Re: parallel restore

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel restore
Date: 2009-02-02 17:32:12
Message-ID: 15684.1233595932@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> I'm almost done reviewing the patch, and will send along an updated
> version shortly.

And here 'tis. I didn't commit because I have no way to test whether
I broke the Windows code path. Please test, and commit if OK.

There is an unfinished TODO item here: we really ought to make it work
for tar-format archives. That's probably not hugely difficult, but
I didn't look into it, and don't think we should hold up applying the
existing patch for it.

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
parallel_restore_17.patch.gz application/octet-stream 20.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2009-02-02 17:42:50 Re: [PATCH] Space reservation v02
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-02-02 16:34:30 Re: new buildfarm client code feature release