Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: parallel restore

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel restore
Date: 2009-02-02 17:32:12
Message-ID: 15684.1233595932@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> I'm almost done reviewing the patch, and will send along an updated
> version shortly.

And here 'tis.  I didn't commit because I have no way to test whether
I broke the Windows code path.  Please test, and commit if OK.

There is an unfinished TODO item here: we really ought to make it work
for tar-format archives.  That's probably not hugely difficult, but
I didn't look into it, and don't think we should hold up applying the
existing patch for it.

			regards, tom lane


Attachment: parallel_restore_17.patch.gz
Description: application/octet-stream (20.7 KB)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Zdenek KotalaDate: 2009-02-02 17:42:50
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Space reservation v02
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2009-02-02 16:34:30
Subject: Re: new buildfarm client code feature release

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group