Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tyler MacDonald <tyler(at)yi(dot)org>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen(dot)wiedmann(at)gmail(dot)com>, Paul DuBois <paul(at)snake(dot)net>, dbi-users(at)perl(dot)org, perl(at)lists(dot)mysql(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions?
Date: 2005-12-01 18:31:25
Message-ID: 15494.1133461885@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> Where is Postgres at with psql using savepoints implicitly to wrap every
> client command btw?

I think that 8.1 psql can be told to do that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-01 18:35:08 Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions?
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2005-12-01 18:24:20 Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql