Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:22 AM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
>> IIRC, the goal here was to be able to benefit from KNN GiST from
>> existing GiST indexes as soon as you restart the server with the new
>> code compiled in. I'm not sure it's that important in the context of
>> preparing 9.1. It seems that pg_upgrade already has to issue a reindex
>> script for GiST indexes.
> I don't think Tom was proposing to change the on-disk format, just the API.
Right, AFAIK there is nothing in KNNGIST that would involve an on-disk
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Mario Weilguni||Date: 2010-12-01 14:51:35|
|Subject: Re: DELETE with LIMIT (or my first hack)|
|Previous:||From: Yeb Havinga||Date: 2010-12-01 14:51:12|
|Subject: Re: FK's to refer to rows in inheritance child|