Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2
Date: 2006-06-26 18:54:56
Message-ID: 15351.1151348096@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Yep, I see 8% here. I will add a patch to allow the ps display to be
> turned off.

I think we'd still want a backend to set the PS display once with its
identification data (user/DB name and client address). It's just the
transient activity updates that should stop.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-06-26 19:07:30 Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-06-26 18:52:50 Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-06-26 19:07:30 Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-06-26 18:52:50 Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2