Re: Found small issue with OUT params

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mike Rylander <mrylander(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Found small issue with OUT params
Date: 2005-09-29 22:18:39
Message-ID: 15120.1128032319@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mike Rylander <mrylander(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Using that logic, a functions with one OUT param would be the same as
> a function returning a rowtype with only one column,

But it's not (and no, I don't want to make it so, because the overhead
for the useless record result would be significant).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Duvall 2005-09-29 22:23:19 Re: postgresql clustering
Previous Message Martin Pitt 2005-09-29 22:06:21 Re: horology regression test failure