Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-11 Call for Reviewers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-11 Call for Reviewers
Date: 2009-11-12 19:12:51
Message-ID: 14846.1258053171@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers

Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> The set of patches I have the least feel for are the five ECPG
> submissions, some of which were reviewed already. I would particularly
> appreciate any early information reviewers might provide about their
> capability/willingness to work on that set. Those are not so easy to
> just split among multiple people due to how they relate to one another.

AFAIK the ecpg patches are all waiting on Michael Meskes to have time
to review/commit them. ecpg is pretty much his turf and no other
committers are likely to touch these patches. If anyone really wants
to review them, of course, that's fine ... but I don't think you should
assign them to someone just because the CF process says to.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Hammonds 2009-11-12 19:27:47 pg_dump enhancement proposal
Previous Message Selena Deckelmann 2009-11-12 19:07:08 Re: Patch committers

Browse pgsql-rrreviewers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-11-12 19:52:20 Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2009-11 Call for Reviewers
Previous Message Greg Smith 2009-11-12 19:05:52 Re: CommitFest 2009-11 Call for Reviewers