Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT
Date: 2000-01-29 15:59:21
Message-ID: 14755.949161561@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>>>> I'd like to yank the END/ABORT commands, since they're non-standard and
>>>> redundant (COMMIT/ROLLBACK). Anyone who could not bear to see them go?
>>
>> Exactly what will this accomplish, other than breaking a lot of existing
>> applications? (Including all of mine, which no doubt biases my thinking.)

> Okay, I was just wondering. But I'm going to change all the notices and
> docs to use commit and rollback instead.

OK, that seems fair enough.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-01-29 16:24:58 Re: [HACKERS] select count(*) from hits group by count;
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-01-29 15:58:37 Re: [HACKERS] TODO list check