Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: broken doc

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: broken doc
Date: 2007-08-31 04:06:12
Message-ID: 14619.1188533172@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tatsuo Ishii wrote
>> Can someone please fix this?

> It's working for me

On Fedora Core 6's sgml toolchain, HEAD builds but un-commenting those
two index entries fails, just as Tatsuo says.

I'm no expert in this, but looking at the complained-of bookindex.sgml
entries makes me think that those index entries have a semantic conflict
with these entries over in indices.sgml:

   <indexterm>
    <primary>GiST</primary>
    <see>index</see>
   </indexterm>

   <indexterm>
    <primary>GIN</primary>
    <see>index</see>
   </indexterm>

Perhaps we need to have a meeting of the minds on who gets to define the
primary index entries about GiST and GIN?

Peter will probably have a clearer idea about how to fix this ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2007-08-31 09:16:40
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] broken doc
Previous:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2007-08-31 03:46:05
Subject: Re: broken doc

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Yoshiyuki AsabaDate: 2007-08-31 06:23:21
Subject: Re: initdb failed on Windows 2000
Previous:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2007-08-31 03:46:05
Subject: Re: broken doc

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group