Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: Fixes to index pages

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Fixes to index pages
Date: 2001-02-22 04:12:47
Message-ID: 13726.982815167@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> The original version of the patch commandeered an extra bit for tuple
>> length.  If you back off INDEX_SIZE_MASK to 1FFF, and document bit
>> 13 as unused/reserved, then it's just a cleanup.

> OK, we are both catching up now on the email.  Should I put it in
> current?  Seems like cosmetic cleanup.  Of course, even if you say yes,
> I have to wait 24 hours.

In the revised form I have no problem with it.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Chad DavidDate: 2001-02-22 18:25:41
Subject: [PATCHES] BlobInputStream.java patch
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-02-22 03:57:50
Subject: Re: Re: Fixes to index pages

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group