Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> The original version of the patch commandeered an extra bit for tuple
>> length. If you back off INDEX_SIZE_MASK to 1FFF, and document bit
>> 13 as unused/reserved, then it's just a cleanup.
> OK, we are both catching up now on the email. Should I put it in
> current? Seems like cosmetic cleanup. Of course, even if you say yes,
> I have to wait 24 hours.
In the revised form I have no problem with it.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Chad David||Date: 2001-02-22 18:25:41|
|Subject: [PATCHES] BlobInputStream.java patch|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2001-02-22 03:57:50|
|Subject: Re: Re: Fixes to index pages|