Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] More SSL questions..

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>,pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org,"Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>,Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,"T(dot)J(dot)" <tjtoocool(at)phreaker(dot)net>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] More SSL questions..
Date: 2005-01-10 16:20:17
Message-ID: 13586.1105374017@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> At this point, Andrew, Magnus, and I who deal with Win32 regularly all
> feel *.conf is more logical than *.txt.  I have not heard anyone say
> *.txt is better except Tom. Is that enough of a vote?

AFAIR they both said they didn't care; you are the only one who is
exercised about this.

I don't particularly care either, but I do note that Peter already
generated what was supposed to be the final version of the man pages,
and we can't change this without changing those.

Do what you want; I have more important problems to worry about right now.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Hiroshi SaitoDate: 2005-01-10 16:20:35
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8 for Win32 -- installation problem
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-01-10 16:09:58
Subject: "SMgrRelation hashtable corrupted" failure identified

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2005-01-10 17:17:12
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] More SSL questions..
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-01-10 15:39:36
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] More SSL questions..

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group