Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 9.2rc1 build requirements

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Joe Abbate <jma(at)freedomcircle(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.2rc1 build requirements
Date: 2012-08-31 01:14:23
Message-ID: 1346375663.18010.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 17:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Abbate <jma(at)freedomcircle(dot)com> writes:
> > As an aside, I installed jade (on Debian) and tried to make world but
> > got several errors, starting with the following:
> 
> > jade  -wall -wno-unused-param -wno-empty -wfully-tagged -D . -D .  -d
> > stylesheet.dsl -t sgml -i output-html -V html-index postgres.sgml
> > jade:E: unknown warning type "fully-tagged"
> 
> FWIW, that suggests that this version of jade is too old.  I'm not sure
> that jade per se (as opposed to the successor project openjade) can be
> used to build our docs at all --- you should check whether this is
> openjade, or really the original project.

This is a bit bizarre, actually.  His problem is that the old version of
jade doesn't understand the -wfully-tagged warning option.  But the
comment in the Makefile says

# -wfully-tagged needed to throw a warning on missing tags
# for older tool chains, 2007-08-31

AFAICT, the desirable effect of all these options together is to warn
about empty start tags, but only openjade supports -wfully-tagged, and
even the most recent version needs it to produce that warning.

Of course there could have been intermediate versions that I don't have
access to right now.



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2012-08-31 01:41:19
Subject: Re: emacs configuration for new perltidy settings
Previous:From: Jaime CasanovaDate: 2012-08-31 00:48:08
Subject: Re: 9.2rc1 build requirements

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group