Re: libpq URI and regression testing

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq URI and regression testing
Date: 2012-04-17 18:41:04
Message-ID: 1334688064.10435.14.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tis, 2012-04-17 at 10:47 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> What's the preferred way to make it automatically tested as much as
> possible? I know the buildfarm does not run "installcheck-world", so if
> we want it there, it'd need a bit more code on the client side. I think
> it would be wise to have it also run on installcheck-world.

It was agreed during the patch discussion that it shouldn't be run
automatically.

> Hmm. Just had this thought: not all platform support the same socket
> types. Maybe we should have separated the .in file in three parts:
> IPv4, IPv6, unix-domain socket. That way each platform would only run
> tests that pertain to it. Right now there's a single "regress.in" file
> that lists all the tests.

That's one reason for that, but there are probably others in the way of
making this fully portable and automatable.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-04-17 18:46:23 Re: Parameterized-path cost comparisons need some work
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-04-17 18:24:02 Re: 9.3 Pre-proposal: Range Merge Join