Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgres code quality

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres code quality
Date: 2012-02-25 00:25:42
Message-ID: 1330129474-sup-3631@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
Excerpts from Adrian Klaver's message of vie feb 24 20:42:49 -0300 2012:
> 
> Kudos to developers and community
> 
> http://lwn.net/Articles/483768/rss
> 
> The headline is about Linux, but the article and report also covers PHP and 
> Postgres. Postgres code shows well.

Meh.  As far as I know we still haven't configured the coverity tools so
that they don't report spurious errors in certain safe coding idioms we
use, so our true defect density is likely to be lower than the article
reports.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Adrian KlaverDate: 2012-02-25 03:32:44
Subject: Re: Postgres code quality
Previous:From: Darren DuncanDate: 2012-02-25 00:18:11
Subject: Re: Slogans for 9.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group