Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Discussion - Search Objects

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Discussion - Search Objects
Date: 2011-06-17 06:37:11
Message-ID: 1308292632.2003.1.camel@laptop (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 00:23 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote:
> 
> 
> 2011/6/17 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
>         On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 23:51 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote:
>         >
>         >
>         >                 I suppose you're talking about "git rebase".
>         Do a "git
>         >                 rebase -i" to get
>         >                 the interactive mode. Let the first commit
>         the way it
>         >                 is. Use squash for
>         >                 the other commits.
>         >
>         >
>         > Yep. This is what I was looking for!
>         > During rebase I made a mistake, so the two patches I sent
>         today are
>         > now included in the big one. Is this undo-able?
>         >
>         
>         
>         Nope. Anyway, it'll be commited as one patch. So, it doesn't
>         matter.
>         
>         >         > Generally, I wanna thank you for your patience and
>         help - I
>         >         know this
>         >         > can be frustrating to answer questions, that are
>         clear to
>         >         you since a
>         >         > long time :)
>         >         >
>         >
>         >
>         >         No problem :)
>         >
>         >
>         > I think it's ready for testing now. I've already checked it
>         against
>         > 8.3.15, 8.4.8, 9.0.4 and 9.1 beta2. On our production
>         database with
>         > 300k objects the search takes about 4-5 seconds. I think
>         it's an
>         > acceptable value.
>         
>         
>         Yes, it is.
>         
>         >  It could be useful to add a hot key to the query from. I
>         was playing
>         > around with extensions today and this would be
>         ergonomically. What do
>         > you think?
>         >
>         
>         
>                 I don't see the link with extensions?
>         
>         
> Sorry, you misunderstood me. Today I've checked create extension
> feature and had to uninstall manually a previous installed extension.

Why didn't you use DROP EXTENSION?

>  So I used the search feature. Because I was working in query form, I
> always had to switch back to the main form and start the search
> dialog. So I thought, it would be great if I could call the search
> dialog from the query form.

Nope, it doesn't belong to the query tool. It makes no sense to add it
there.


-- 
Guillaume
  http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
  http://www.dalibo.com


In response to

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Erwin BrandstetterDate: 2011-06-19 17:36:53
Subject: Re: Branch 1.14?
Previous:From: Ashesh VashiDate: 2011-06-17 04:35:20
Subject: Re: Discussion - Search Objects

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group