On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 00:23 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote:
> 2011/6/17 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
> On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 23:51 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote:
> > I suppose you're talking about "git rebase".
> Do a "git
> > rebase -i" to get
> > the interactive mode. Let the first commit
> the way it
> > is. Use squash for
> > the other commits.
> > Yep. This is what I was looking for!
> > During rebase I made a mistake, so the two patches I sent
> today are
> > now included in the big one. Is this undo-able?
> Nope. Anyway, it'll be commited as one patch. So, it doesn't
> > > Generally, I wanna thank you for your patience and
> help - I
> > know this
> > > can be frustrating to answer questions, that are
> clear to
> > you since a
> > > long time :)
> > >
> > No problem :)
> > I think it's ready for testing now. I've already checked it
> > 8.3.15, 8.4.8, 9.0.4 and 9.1 beta2. On our production
> database with
> > 300k objects the search takes about 4-5 seconds. I think
> it's an
> > acceptable value.
> Yes, it is.
> > It could be useful to add a hot key to the query from. I
> was playing
> > around with extensions today and this would be
> ergonomically. What do
> > you think?
> I don't see the link with extensions?
> Sorry, you misunderstood me. Today I've checked create extension
> feature and had to uninstall manually a previous installed extension.
Why didn't you use DROP EXTENSION?
> So I used the search feature. Because I was working in query form, I
> always had to switch back to the main form and start the search
> dialog. So I thought, it would be great if I could call the search
> dialog from the query form.
Nope, it doesn't belong to the query tool. It makes no sense to add it
In response to
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Erwin Brandstetter||Date: 2011-06-19 17:36:53|
|Subject: Re: Branch 1.14?|
|Previous:||From: Ashesh Vashi||Date: 2011-06-17 04:35:20|
|Subject: Re: Discussion - Search Objects|