Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #5946: Long exclusive lock taken by vacuum (not full)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Rainer Pruy <rainer(dot)pruy(at)acrys(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #5946: Long exclusive lock taken by vacuum (not full)
Date: 2011-03-28 14:05:36
Message-ID: 1301321082-sup-1641@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Rainer, any idea?  Please see
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4D906269.6060109@commandprompt.com


Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of lun mar 28 11:03:16 -0300 2011:
> Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of lun mar 28 07:26:49 -0300 2011:
> > Likely "too large" is more an issue related to available resources than
> > of absolute figure.
> > 
> > On a penta byte of free storage I would not mind allocating some teras
> > with extending a (large) table.
> > If I'm left with some MB only, I'd be concerned for sure.
> 
> ...
> 
> Does anybody have an idea just W-T-F happened here?  I did NOT send the
> above email (as evidenced by it being signed by "Rainer").  I notice it
> even has a "@commandprompt.com" message-id.  Should I start signing my
> email?
> 

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Rainer PruyDate: 2011-03-28 14:28:54
Subject: Re: BUG #5946: Long exclusive lock taken by vacuum (not full)
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2011-03-28 14:03:16
Subject: Re: BUG #5946: Long exclusive lock taken by vacuum (not full)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group