Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: why is max standby delay only 35 minutes?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: why is max standby delay only 35 minutes?
Date: 2011-03-17 18:25:51
Message-ID: 1300386351.16241.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On tis, 2011-03-15 at 20:44 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Consequently, I propose the attached patch.  I didn't find any
> relevant documentation references that would need updating.

Applied.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2011-03-17 18:31:08
Subject: Re: BUG #5842: Memory leak in PL/Python when taking slices of results
Previous:From: Thom BrownDate: 2011-03-17 17:59:29
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix various possible problems with synchronous replication.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group