Re: Better estimates of index correlation

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Better estimates of index correlation
Date: 2011-03-14 02:20:01
Message-ID: 1300069201.22696.2.camel@jd-desktop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 19:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> I'm not planning to do anything about this idea right now, since I'm
> still hip-deep in collations, but I thought I'd throw it out to get
> it on the record.
>
> Comments?

One question: Where is the overhead increase?

JD

>
> regards, tom lane
>

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Golub 2011-03-14 06:30:01 Re: Multi-language glossary of PostgreSQL terms.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-03-13 23:40:00 Better estimates of index correlation