Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of sáb feb 26 02:24:26 -0300 2011:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > Excerpts from Rod Taylor's message of vie feb 25 14:03:58 -0300 2011:
> >> How practical would it be for analyze to keep a record of response times for
> >> given sections of a table as it randomly accesses them and generate some
> >> kind of a map for expected response times for the pieces of data it is
> >> analysing?
> > I think what you want is random_page_cost that can be tailored per
> > tablespace.
> We have that.
> But it's not the same as tracking *sections of a table*.
I dunno. I imagine if you have a "section" of a table in different
storage than other sections, you created a tablespace and moved the
partition holding that section there. Otherwise, how do you prevent the
tuples from moving to other "sections"? (We don't really have a concept
of "sections" of a table.)
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-02-28 18:45:04|
|Subject: Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies |
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2011-02-28 18:40:40|
|Subject: Re: Sync Rep v17|