Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Phil Thompson <phil(at)river-bank(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes
Date: 1998-04-30 18:42:58
Message-ID: 12979.893961778@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
Phil Thompson <phil(at)river-bank(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> I've misunderstood the protocol - and the protocol specification is
> therefore wrong (or at least incomplete) in this respect.  Do you want
> to fix the spec and include your enhancements or shall I?

Yes, there are some things I thought were wrong in the programmer's guide
chapter about the FE/BE protocol.  I'd be happy to submit revised text.

I haven't paid any attention yet to how the documentation is handled.
Is the stuff in the distribution under doc/src/sgml considered the
editable master text, or is it generated from some other format?
Do I need to subscribe to pgsql-docs to find out what to do? :-)

			regards, tom lane

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: aldevDate: 1998-04-30 18:55:57
Subject: PostgreSQL HOWTO Version 6.0 released
Previous:From: Phil ThompsonDate: 1998-04-30 18:33:43
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 1998-04-30 20:36:05
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: retrieving varchar size
Previous:From: Phil ThompsonDate: 1998-04-30 18:33:43
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group