From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers |
Date: | 2011-01-27 00:45:32 |
Message-ID: | 1296089132.9070.333.camel@jd-desktop |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers |
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 17:39 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Richard Broersma
> <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> I'm not sure what you mean by this.
> >
> > Now that I read it, I not sure what I meant either. :) How about this: the
> > selection, management, and oversight of grants and mentees should be opaque
> > to the community so as to prevent distraction. There should be no
> > appearance of community endorsement of such programs.
>
> I think there's no need to announce who you've made grants too, if
> that's what you mean. But it shouldn't be hidden from the community
> either. We ought to know who to praise/blame if something good/bad
> happens.
We are a 501c3. I don't think we are allowed to hide it even if we
wanted to :P
JD
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-01-27 00:52:10 | Re: ALTER TYPE 3: add facility to identify further no-work cases |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-01-27 00:44:43 | Re: ALTER TYPE 3: add facility to identify further no-work cases |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ghatpande | 2011-01-27 08:49:18 | Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-26 22:39:47 | Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers |