Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either
Date: 2011-01-01 21:28:34
Message-ID: 1293917314.5984.8.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On lör, 2011-01-01 at 10:00 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> Is it in any better if we write one string per feature, like this:
> 
> constraints cannot be used on %s
> triggers cannot be used on %s
> 
> ...where %s is a plural object type (views, foreign tables, etc.).

No, this won't work.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-01-01 22:17:17
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE .. SET SCHEMA lock strength
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2011-01-01 21:28:10
Subject: Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group