Excerpts from Jeff Davis's message of mié dic 01 22:48:36 -0300 2010:
> I can't see any place that "cachedFetchXid" is ever invalidated.
> Shouldn't it be invalidated before transaction ID wraparound?
>
> It's difficult to construct a test case to show whether this is a
> problem or not,
Couldn't you just create a C function that advanced the Xid counter by,
say, 100k?
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Yeb Havinga | Date: 2010-12-02 13:48:28 |
| Subject: Re: FK's to refer to rows in inheritance child |
| Previous: | From: Andrew Dunstan | Date: 2010-12-02 13:41:54 |
| Subject: Re: When will 8.1 be EOLed? |