From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: max_wal_senders must die |
Date: | 2010-10-29 00:22:03 |
Message-ID: | 1288311723.22359.178.camel@jd-desktop |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 17:12 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Sorry, didn't know... I have 122 responses so far, which I think will be
> > surprising (some of them certainly surprised me). I will keep it open
> > until next week and then post the results.
>
> Well, for any community site poll, I hope you realize that there's a LOT
> of sampling error. Here's another one:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/community/survey.71
>
Oh sure. I don't expect this to be some kind of authoritative reference
but it is certainly worth at least reviewing. If nothing else it is fun
to see the responses and consider their meaning based on your own views.
JD
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2010-10-29 03:00:24 | sorted writes for checkpoints |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-10-29 00:12:06 | Re: max_wal_senders must die |