Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #5722: vacuum full does not update last_vacuum statistics

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jochen Erwied <jochen(at)pgsql(dot)erwied(dot)eu>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #5722: vacuum full does not update last_vacuum statistics
Date: 2010-10-25 18:58:14
Message-ID: 1288033094.9047.7.camel@jdavis-ux.asterdata.local (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 10:46 -0700, Greg Stark wrote:
> Perhaps we should have another field last_table_rewrite or something?

Seems like overkill. And we don't want to make it sound like table
rewrites are expected to be a normal part of maintenance (perhaps that's
just a terminology issue, however).

Regards,
	Jeff Davis


In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2010-10-25 21:43:27
Subject: Re: BUG #5725: server couldn't start when installing on liveCD
Previous:From: VMauryDate: 2010-10-25 18:44:01
Subject: BUG #5725: server couldn't start when installing on liveCD

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group