Re: returning multiple result sets from a stored procedure

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, John Adams <john_adams_mail(at)yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: returning multiple result sets from a stored procedure
Date: 2010-09-05 18:26:03
Message-ID: 1283711163.12666.5.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On fre, 2010-09-03 at 16:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Part of the reason it's sat on TODO is lack of consensus about how
> such a feature ought to look/work; particularly since most of the
> discussion about it has considered that it'd go along with stored
> procedures executing outside of transactions.

I would probably be a mistake to tie these features together. They are
tricky enough separately.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-09-05 18:28:10 Re: Functional dependencies and GROUP BY
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-09-05 18:18:22 Re: returning multiple result sets from a stored procedure