Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: refactoring comment.c

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: refactoring comment.c
Date: 2010-08-27 20:16:17
Message-ID: 1282940177.3445.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On fre, 2010-08-27 at 07:49 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Anyway, committed.

I suppose this is responsible for this:

gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing
-fwrapv -g -Werror -Wno-inline -I../../../src/include -D_GNU_SOURCE
-I/usr/include/libxml2   -c -o objectaddress.o objectaddress.c -MMD -MP
-MF .deps/objectaddress.Po
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
objectaddress.c: In function ‘get_object_address’:
objectaddress.c:102: error: ‘address.objectId’ may be used uninitialized
in this function
objectaddress.c:102: error: ‘address.classId’ may be used uninitialized
in this function
make[1]: *** [objectaddress.o] Error 1


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-08-27 20:21:08
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HS/SR on AIX
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-08-27 20:02:52
Subject: Re: Git conversion progress report and call for testing assistance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group