Re: [9.1] pg_stat_get_backend_server_addr

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [9.1] pg_stat_get_backend_server_addr
Date: 2010-08-23 19:16:42
Message-ID: 1282591002.3075.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tor, 2010-05-27 at 22:32 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I suggest that we add the functions pg_stat_get_backend_server_addr
> and pg_stat_get_backend_server_port, but don't expose them in
> pg_stat_activity. (_server_port is really mostly for symmetry,
> because you can't currently bind to multiple ports.)

I think I'm not going to pursue this patch anymore. There hasn't been
any enthusiasm from anyone else, and if necessary the information can be
carved out of netstat.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-08-23 19:19:54 Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-08-23 19:15:34 Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?