Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [9.1] pg_stat_get_backend_server_addr

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [9.1] pg_stat_get_backend_server_addr
Date: 2010-08-23 19:16:42
Message-ID: 1282591002.3075.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On tor, 2010-05-27 at 22:32 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I suggest that we add the functions pg_stat_get_backend_server_addr
> and pg_stat_get_backend_server_port, but don't expose them in
> pg_stat_activity.  (_server_port is really mostly for symmetry,
> because you can't currently bind to multiple ports.)

I think I'm not going to pursue this patch anymore.  There hasn't been
any enthusiasm from anyone else, and if necessary the information can be
carved out of netstat.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2010-08-23 19:19:54
Subject: Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-08-23 19:15:34
Subject: Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group