On tor, 2010-05-27 at 22:32 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I suggest that we add the functions pg_stat_get_backend_server_addr
> and pg_stat_get_backend_server_port, but don't expose them in
> pg_stat_activity.  (_server_port is really mostly for symmetry,
> because you can't currently bind to multiple ports.)

I think I'm not going to pursue this patch anymore.  There hasn't been
any enthusiasm from anyone else, and if necessary the information can be
carved out of netstat.

In response to

• [9.1] pg_stat_get_backend_server_addr at 2010-05-27 19:32:25 from Peter Eisentraut

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Alvaro Herrera	Date: 2010-08-23 19:19:54
	Subject: Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2010-08-23 19:15:34
	Subject: Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?