On fre, 2010-08-06 at 09:04 +0100, Mike Fowler wrote:
> If the patch is to be committed, does it make sense for me to refine
> it such that it uses the new xpath internal function you extracted in
> the xmlexists patch?
Yes, you can probably shrink this patch down to about 20 lines.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: David E. Wheeler||Date: 2010-08-06 20:05:26|
|Subject: Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch |
|Previous:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2010-08-06 19:53:55|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgres 9.0 crash when bringing up hot standby|
pgsql-rrreviewers by date
|Next:||From: Mike Fowler||Date: 2010-08-07 15:38:06|
|Subject: Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function|
|Previous:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2010-08-06 14:31:13|
|Subject: Re: CommitFest 2010-07 week three progress report|