Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Round Robin Reviewers <pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function
Date: 2010-08-06 19:55:05
Message-ID: 1281124505.2563.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-rrreviewers 
On fre, 2010-08-06 at 09:04 +0100, Mike Fowler wrote:
> If the patch is to be committed, does it make sense for me to refine
> it such that it uses the new xpath internal function you extracted in
> the xmlexists patch?

Yes, you can probably shrink this patch down to about 20 lines.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2010-08-06 20:05:26
Subject: Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-08-06 19:53:55
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgres 9.0 crash when bringing up hot standby

pgsql-rrreviewers by date

Next:From: Mike FowlerDate: 2010-08-07 15:38:06
Subject: Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function
Previous:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2010-08-06 14:31:13
Subject: Re: CommitFest 2010-07 week three progress report

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group