Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: antisocial things you can do in git (but not CVS)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet(at)lwn(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: antisocial things you can do in git (but not CVS)
Date: 2010-07-24 17:28:36
Message-ID: 1279992516.22066.6.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On lör, 2010-07-24 at 07:02 -0700, Ron Mayer wrote:
> Instead of squashing every patch into a single commit, what if it got
> squashed into a perhaps 3 separate commits -- one as submitted, one
> as reviewed, and one as re-written by the committer.  History stays
> linear; and you keep the most relevant parts of the history,
> while dropping all the development brainstorming commits.

But then there would be commits in the main repository that were known
not good enough.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2010-07-24 17:48:50
Subject: Re: antisocial things you can do in git (but not CVS)
Previous:From: Dimitri FontaineDate: 2010-07-24 17:26:51
Subject: Re: bg worker: overview

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group