Re: PG 9.1 tentative timeline

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "Pr, Solaiyappan (NSN - IN/Bangalore)" <solaiyappan(dot)pr(at)nsn(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG 9.1 tentative timeline
Date: 2010-06-14 16:20:42
Message-ID: 1276532442.13278.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On sön, 2010-06-13 at 12:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> >> I wrote it down now:
> >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.1_Development_Plan
>
> > Thanks! Looks good, except I thought our plan was to cut alpha1
> > before the git switch.
>
> Yes, I thought so too. The page lists those events in the right order,
> but now I see the associated dates don't agree.

Yeah, I just wrote down the facts. If the facts don't make sense, we
need to discuss changes.

I think it would make most sense to moved the Git switch to, say, August
21, which btw. is a Saturday.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-06-14 16:25:34 Reviewfest 2010-06 Plans and Call for Reviewers
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-06-14 16:11:29 Re: warning message in standby