From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Check compulsory parameters in recovery.conf in standby_mode, per |
Date: | 2010-04-06 13:15:53 |
Message-ID: | 1270559753.24910.6089.camel@ebony |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 16:01 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > Having the Startup process wait does not buy us anything at all.
> > Currently if the Startup process finishes more quickly than the
> > WALreceiver it will wait for 100ms.
>
> Ok, here's a patch to add signaling between walreceiver and startup
> process. It indeed isn't much code, and seems pretty safe, so if no-one
> objects strongly, I'll commit. It won't help on platforms where
> pg_usleep() isn't interrupted by signals, though, but we can live with that.
Looks good.
There is also the fixed 5 sec wait when polling the archive. I would
like to make that a parameter, since that was previously controllable
with pg_standby.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-04-06 14:11:08 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Check compulsory parameters in recovery.conf in standby_mode, per |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-04-06 13:01:29 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Check compulsory parameters in recovery.conf in standby_mode, per |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-04-06 13:57:37 | Re: message clarifications |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2010-04-06 13:07:06 | Re: SELECT constant; takes 15x longer on 9.0? |