Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Parallel pg_dump for 9.1

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Parallel pg_dump for 9.1
Date: 2010-03-30 11:01:54
Message-ID: 1269946914.21080.0.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On tis, 2010-03-30 at 08:39 +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> on fast systems pg_dump is completely CPU bottlenecked 

Might be useful to profile why that is.  I don't think pg_dump has
historically been developed with CPU efficiency in mind.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2010-03-30 11:04:48
Subject: Re: GSoC
Previous:From: MUHAMMAD ASIFDate: 2010-03-30 09:23:31
Subject: Re: UUIDs generated using ossp-uuid on windows not unique

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group